For Laser Marking, Which One Is Better, CO2 Or Fiber Optic?

The choice between CO2 and fiber laser marking depends on several factors, including the specific application requirements, material properties, and desired marking outcomes. Here are some key considerations when comparing CO2 and fiber laser marking:

CO2 Laser Marking:

Wavelength: CO2 lasers have a longer wavelength (10.6 micrometers) compared to fiber lasers. This longer wavelength makes them well-suited for marking non-metallic materials like plastics, wood, glass, paper, leather, and certain organic materials.

Marking Speed: CO2 lasers typically have slower marking speeds compared to fiber lasers. However, they are still capable of achieving acceptable marking speeds for many applications.

Marking Depth: CO2 lasers have the ability to create deeper marks compared to fiber lasers. This can be advantageous for applications where a deep, permanent mark is required.

Flexibility: CO2 lasers offer versatility in terms of the range of materials they can mark. They can handle a wide variety of non-metallic materials with excellent results.

Fiber Laser Marking:

Wavelength: Fiber lasers have a shorter wavelength (typically 1.06 micrometers) compared to CO2 lasers. This shorter wavelength is highly absorbed by metals, making fiber lasers ideal for marking and engraving a wide range of metals, including stainless steel, aluminum, copper, brass, and more.

Marking Speed: Fiber lasers are known for their high-speed marking capabilities. They can achieve rapid marking speeds, making them suitable for high-volume production environments.

Precision and Detail: Fiber lasers offer exceptional beam quality, resulting in high-resolution and fine-detail marking. They can create sharp, precise lines, small characters, and intricate designs with excellent accuracy.

Permanent Marking: Fiber laser markings on metals are highly durable and resistant to wear, corrosion, and fading. This makes them suitable for applications that require long-lasting, permanent marks.

Maintenance: Fiber lasers generally require less maintenance compared to CO2 lasers. They have a solid-state design with no moving parts, which reduces the need for regular maintenance and minimizes downtime.

It is important to note that the choice of CO2 or fiber laser marking depends on the specific requirements of your application. If you are primarily working with non-metallic materials, CO2 laser marking may be more suitable. On the other hand, if your focus is on marking metal or achieving high speeds, fiber laser marking is the first choice. Consulting with the laser marking experts – Laserdelta or testing sample materials can help determine the best laser marking solution for your specific needs.

Related Post

Application of laser marking machine in cable industry
Analysis of laser application in tire industry
There are many types of laser engraving, allowing us to see the dawn of technology
What is the difference between a laser marking machine and a laser engraving machine?
Лазерная маркировка очков для защиты от подделок
Laser marking for eyewear anti-counterfeiting technology
Анализ преимуществ резки тонких/толстых листов волоконным лазером
Analysis of the advantages of fiber laser thin/thick plate cutting

Related Cases

No posts found

Related Products

Scroll to Top
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.